Finger waggers. Overbearing. Politicizing. Being dogmatic. These are the most often used phrases to describe native plant advocates of all stripes. But what advocate doesn't come off like this, especially to someone with a different point of view? When anyone has an opinion about anything – from oil pipelines to twerking to drone strikes to soccer matches to tee shirts -- they open themselves to heated debate; if anything, my massive foray into social media has shown just how diabolical the waters of opinion are.
Some
native plant advocates certainly come off as uber passionate, perhaps zealous, maybe at times too "loud" (ahem). I bet much of the same was said about our greatest social change
advocates. But there’s something much deeper here besides the knee jerk
reaction to tone, diction, and passion -- the latter which I'm convinced most people really don't want others to have despite the plethora of memes saying so.
What's at the heart here is realizing how we garden effects the world in both negative and positive
ways. That cumulatively what we do on our ¼ acre lots is a massive destructive
or constructive force that also influences or is reflected in how we travel, drive, and source our lifestyle. This places a larger amount of responsibility on people already
burdened with things like mortgage payments, making dinner, kids’ piano
lessons, sick parents, a bad job…. We sure don’t need to think any more about
our lives, and certainly not in a way that complicates them – like a recent piece
I read that showed going vegetarian will cut your carbon footprint in half. Oh
goodness, “carbon footprint?” That opens up a whole can of worms about what I
can or cannot do, should or should not do, and butts right up against political
language and the divisive nature of our stagnant government where pro / con language creates a sort of animosity of thought.
 |
| Coreopsis, Dalea, Liatris |
But
you know what? The environment is a political issue. And it is such because it
is a moral issue. Almost every political impulse is inspired by a moral or ethical one
(for good or bad) – that’s why we have more and more freedoms being passed for those in the LGBT community, why we value clean water, why
we don’t want kids sucking on lead paint toys, why you don’t drink and drive, etc.
I was watching Kumi Naidoo, Greenpeace executive director, being interviewed by Bill Moyers. He talked about how Greenpeace was started by anti Vietnam War Quakers, and thus at Greenpeace's core is the idea of bearing witness -- here's how he explains it:
"If there's an injustice in the world, those of us that have the ability to witness it and to record it, document it and tell the world what is happening have a moral responsibility to do that. Then, of course, it's left up to those that are receiving that knowledge to make the moral choice about whether they want to stand up against the injustice or observe it."
I was watching Kumi Naidoo, Greenpeace executive director, being interviewed by Bill Moyers. He talked about how Greenpeace was started by anti Vietnam War Quakers, and thus at Greenpeace's core is the idea of bearing witness -- here's how he explains it:
"If there's an injustice in the world, those of us that have the ability to witness it and to record it, document it and tell the world what is happening have a moral responsibility to do that. Then, of course, it's left up to those that are receiving that knowledge to make the moral choice about whether they want to stand up against the injustice or observe it."
For
some people a finger wag works. For others a passionate cry. For others a
gentle, slow, oft repeated plea. And for yet others example upon example of
what we should strive for no matter how uncomfortable it might be. Each person receives and accepts (or denies)
information given to them based on personal preferences influenced by their
cultural and social background or what kind of day they’ve had. It’s impossible
to convey meaning to someone in one sentence using a dozen different
strategies.
So
I’ve digressed, but if appearances are what we’re so concerned about in how we
talk about gardens and landscapes (and climate change and extinction), we’ll never ever have a good, deeper
conversation about them or how we fit into nature as a species which re-imagines
nature through our fallible emotions and intentions -- like gardens.
 |
| Asclepais syriaca & tuberosa -- Spring Creek Prairie, Nebraska |
Why
are native plants important for me? They are a bearing witness to our role in nature. They make me aware of environmental issues
close to home, like prairie loss which influences ecosystem services, agricultural issues such as topsoil loss
and water depletion, how plant communities function above and below the soil line -- they even provide a lesson in cultural and social inequality. Most importantly they empower me. I’m not buying into a
horticultural system that flashes the latest new thing in front of my eye like
I’m at a New York fashion show – I’m not a self centered consumer looking for
the newest temporary thrill without thinking on how that object was made; the act of buying something will only assuage my
tumultuous emotions in a complex world for a brief amount of time. Plants are
not LED televisions, sports cars, or shoes. Neither are pets, by the way.
I
think about my actions (some say dwell). It takes a bit more work, for sure,
and it makes me vulnerable to some negative stuff that hurts and shrinks my
human ego. But the thinking also makes me vulnerable to some pretty incredible
insights and transformations that embolden me to speak up for what I most care
about – the world that sustains us and which we still know so little about,
including ourselves. Without native plant gardens we will never fully understand who
we are, where we’ve come from, or where we’re going -- and if any of these directions
points us to what we really want for ourselves and those who come after.
