Gardening
 is a personal expression. It's "my art." It's a possession. And there's
 the problem. Aldo Leopold said that our land ethic is messed up because
 we treat the land as a possession, something that benefits us alone. If
 we say gardens should have most or all native plants in them, to many 
people that sounds like a personal dogma forced upon creative free will 
-- but that interpretation is being 
filtered through a western culture that puts human self above all else, 
and especially a concept of "American freedom" that is quite the 
antithesis to what an ideal democracy actually stands for (i.e. being selfless). 
 
Just because someone might strongly advocate for all native plant 
gardens does not limit your aesthetic choices -- in fact, it also 
expands your ethical ones, connecting you to your family, your children,
 your children's children, and all other humans and species who are 
bound together in ways we ignore in every aspect of our privileged 
lives. We are a navel gazing group, and at the first call of thinking 
beyond the self we expend more energy denying real freedom than enacting
 it; that's freedom to have clean air, safe water, a sound agricultural 
system full of beneficial pollinators, and a secure economy based on all
 of the above. Native plants in a garden maybe won't save the 
environment, but they'll get us thinking about when and why the 
environment needs saving, and how to think in a radical new way to make 
it happen.
 
 
1 comment:
I agree wholeheartedly with you about water conservation and use of native plants, but disagree that we are a democracy. We are a republic, a nation of people who elect officials to represent us and our interests in Washington. That they often don't is an unfortunate failure of the system.
Post a Comment